TWO SKULLS OF ХVІ–ХVІІ CENTURIES FROM PERESOPNYTSYA
Keywords:
craniology, cranioscopy, archaeology, Peresopnyntsia, Lithuanian-Polish period.Abstract
In the article, the skulls of two women have been analyzes buried in the Lithuanian-Polish age and found in the village of Peresopnytsya, Rivne district, Rivne region at the land area of citizen M. V Fedoryshyn during excavations in 2012. It has been discovered that the skull from the burial 1 belongs to a 25–35 years old woman and characterized by a distinct brahicrany skull. Ear height is moderate. The forehead is convex, well bulging. The face is of moderate width, low, weakly profiled on the top and well on the middle level. By general face index it is wide (euriprozopiya). Upper face index is moderate (mesen) on the edge of the small sizes. Orbits are moderate by the index (mezoconhy). By nasal index the relative width of the nose is moderate (mezoriny). The bridge of nose is low according to the symotical index and high by the decrial one. The angle of nose protrusion is large. The skull from the burial 2 belongs to a 22-30 years old woman and is characterized by brahicrany and moderately high skull. The width of the frontal bone in the frontal plane is small, the nape is moderately bulging and it’s sharp. The width of the face is large. Upper face index falls into the category of eurien. General face index indicates the broad face – euriprozopiya. Nasomalar angle indicates weakly profiled face on the upper level and strongly on the middle one. The orbits are of moderate height after the index (mezoconhy). The relative width of the nose by the nasal index is average (mezoriny). Symotical index is low, so the bridge is low. Decrial pointer is moderate. The angle of the nose protrusion is small to the line of face profile. Considering the angles of horizontal profiling of the face, brahicrany shape of the skull and low nose it can be said that in general, by the craniological features, women skulls belong to the mixed Caucasoid and Mongoloid race (mestizos). According to the craniometry and ethnic cranioscopy data there is some similarity between the buried. Identical are the followings: the nasal and front-cross pointer, the height of the forehead bending, the width of the skull base, zygomaxillary angle, absence of above orbital holes both on the right and left orbits. Similar are cranial pointer, upper face index, symotical and orbital indexes etc.
References
Абиндер H. A. Трансверзальная уплощенность лицевого скелета // Антропологический сборник 1. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1960. С. 153–178. (Труды Института этнографии им. Н. Н. Миклухо-Маклая. Новая серия. Т. L).
Алексеев В. П., Дебец Г.Ф. Краниометрия. Методика антропологических исследований. М.: Наука, 1964. 127 с.
Занина-Покровская В. С. О форме альвеолярной дуги у ранних этнических групп // Вопросы антропологии. Вып. 42, М., 1972. С. 119–129.
Козинцев А. Г. Этническая краниоскопия: расовая изменчивость швов черепа современного человека. Л.: Наука, 1988. 168 с.
Мовсесян А. А., Мамонова Н. Н., Рычков Ю. Г. Программа и методика исследования аномалий черепа // Вопросы антропологии. Вып. 51. М., 1975. С. 127–150.
Мовсесян А. А. Фенетический анализ в палеоантропологии. М.: МГУ, 2005. С. 272.
Прищепа Б. А., Харковець Ю.І., Войтюк О. П., Позіховський О. А., Чекурков В.С. Звіт про археологічні роботи в селі Пересопниця Рівненської області в 2012 році // Фонди Культурно-археологічного центру «Пересопниця». Рівне. № 785.
Прищепа Б. А., Харьковець Ю.І. Роботи на ділянці М. В. Федоришина у с. Пересопниця // Археологічні дослідження в Україні 2012. К.-Луцьк, 2013. С. 310–311.
Томашевич Т. В. Закономерности распределения частот надглазничных каналов черепа человека // Вопросы антропологии. М.
Вып. 80. С. 119–128.
Berry A. C., Berry R.J. Epigenetic Variation in the Human Cranium // Journal of Anatomy. 1967. V. 101. P. 361–379.
Brothwell D. R. Digging up Bones. London: Trustees of the British museum, 1972. 194 p.
Buikstra J., D. Ubelaker. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains // Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series. No. 44. 1994. 206 p.
Buxton L. H. D., Morant G. D. Essential craniological technique // Journal Royal Anthropological Institute. 1933. V. 63. P. 19–47.
Dodo Y., Ishida H Incidences of Nonmetric Cranial Variants in Several Population Samples from East Asia and North America // JASN.
Vol. 95. N 2. P. 19–35.
Kozintsev A. Homo. Ethnic epigenetics: A new approach Ethnische Epigenetik. Neue Methoden und Ergebnisse Vol. 43/3. Gustav Fischer – Stuttgart, Jena, Nev York, 1992. Pр. 213–244.
Ortner D. J. Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains. San Diego, California, 2003. 645 p.
Martin Rudolf. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie. In systematischer Darstellung. Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der anthropologischen Methoden für Studierende, Ärzte und Forschungsreisende. Zweite, vermehrte Auflage. Zweiter Band: kraniologie, osteologie Mit 281 abbildungen im text. Jena: Verlag von Gustaf Fischer. Bd. II. 1928. 1062 s.
Ubelaker D. N. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation. Albine Manuals on Archaeology. 3rd ed. Chicago, 1989. 116 p. 19. Vallois H. V. La duree de la vie chez l`homme fossile // L`Ànthropologie. 1937. № 47. P. 499–532.