Publication Ethics

1. Responsibility and duties of the editorial office

Decision on acceptance of articles to the editorial office

The editorial board of the journal reserves the right to publish an article or to refuse the author to publish it. When making a decision on the acceptance or rejection of articles, the editorial board is guided by the political journal (relevance of scientific specialization), basic requirements for publications, etc. The editors of the journal have the right to reject/return the article for revision if it does not meet the requirements or to accept it for publication if there are no comments on it.

Impartiality

The editorial board accepts scientific works in terms of their content and rules of design independent of race, status, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, political views, ethnicity, citizenship, etc.

Privacy

The editorial board does not disclose information regarding the acceptance or rejection of an article to anyone except the author(s), co-author(s), reviewers; as well as personal authors.

Conflicts of interest

The editorial board of the journal is guided by the Regulation on refusal to publish scientific articles of the Publishing Ethics Committee when it comes to rejecting articles or correcting already published work.

Unpublished materials in an article accepted for editing are not used by members of the editorial board for their own research without reference to the author of the already published work. Interesting and useful information from these data can be used only for familiarization and not used in one's own interests.

Advertising, reprinting and other manipulations do not affect the decision of the members of the editorial board regarding the acceptance of articles for publication.

The editors of the journal undertake to carry out technical, scientific, linguistic editing of accepted articles.

The editorial board undertakes to reach out and interact with potential and actual authors of articles, providing them with the help they need and answering their questions.

2. Responsibility and duties of reviewers

Participation in editorial decisions

Editorial review of the decisions made regarding acceptance of articles for publication or refusal to publish. It serves as a reviewer for the author in correcting and improving your work.

Privacy

Any scientific work that is subject to review is considered a confidential document that is not subject to discussion with third parties.

Objectivity

Reviewing is always objective. Personal criticism of the authors is unacceptable. Reviewers express their opinions clearly with constructive comments and advice.

Confirmation of scientific sources

Reviewers are not indicated in the sources, the authors of which were not indicated in the work. Any research or judgments that have been previously discovered by other authors must be referenced to the work of that author/authors. The reviewers also check statistics and plagiarism and notices from editorial board members about its presence.

Conflicts of interest

Unpublished material in an article submitted for review may not be used by reviewers for their own research without reference to the author of the already published work. Interesting and useful information from the presented articles can be used only for familiarization and not used in one's own interests.

3. Authors' responsibility and obligations

Reporting on the reliability of information

Authors presenting the results of their research in an article should present them in accordance with the requirements for the design of articles in a clear sequence. Articles should contain a description of the main research and, necessarily, additional data and references to other works that were used to conduct the research. The presence of false or inaccurate data is unacceptable and is considered a violation of publication ethics.

Authenticity and plagiarism

Authors submitting their articles to the editorial office of the journal must guarantee the reliability of the data presented in their works. In case of using the data of other scientists, the authors of the articles should make a reference to their research in the list of used literature.

Multiple publication of one article

Authors are not allowed to submit an article for publication that has already been published.

Confirmation of scientific sources

Authors must indicate (cite) the publications whose data were used during the research and writing of the scientific article.

Authorship of the article

Co-authors of the article are those who made a significant contribution to the research to which the article is devoted. All co-authors must be familiar with and agree with the final version of the publication. All co-authors of the article must be indicated before submitting the work to the editors.

Errors in published works

If the author of the article finds a significant error or inaccuracy in his already published work, he should inform the editor or the responsible secretary of the journal about it in order to find an appropriate solution to eliminate this problem (reprinting the journal or publishing the corresponding corrections in another journal).

During the entire period of existence of the journal, the editorial office has never received any complaints about the abuse of official position. All problematic issues related to the finalization of articles are resolved with the authors personally and openly and, as a rule, do not have significant contradictions. The editors have never received any complaints about the editing of scientific works (technical, scientific, linguistic, etc.) from the authors of the articles.

The editorial staff of the journal is always open to wishes and suggestions.