PRAGMALINGUISTIC FEATURES OF CLICKBAITING STRATEGY IN THE HEADLINES OF YOUTUBE EDUCATIONAL VIDEOS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2307-1222.2024-57-18

Keywords:

clickbaiting strategy, pragmalinguistic features, title, YouTube, video

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of such a phenomenon as clickbaiting from the point of view of linguistic pragmatics. The analysis focuses on pragmalinguistic features of the clickbaiting strategy in the headlines of English YouTube educational videos. In particular, formal-structural, lexical and syntactic features are investigated. The material of the study makes up about 200 titles for videos about the ways and means of learning foreign languages, chosen by random selection in the YouTube network. Clickbaiting is defined as a manipulative strategy in headlines that deliberately misleads YouTube users and encourages them to click the link. This is supposed to result in benefit, different from the one stated in the title. It has been established that the pragmalinguistic features of the clickbaiting strategy in the titles to the video about the ways and means of learning foreign languages are as follows: a fixed number of words in the title (from 5 to 12); one-component and two-component title models; use of verbs typical for effective learning in the imperative and infinitive form; qualitative adjectives in degrees of comparison for hyperbolization of value; quantitative numerals for specification, indefinite-personal pronouns with the meaning of generalization. The most commonly used syntactic structures are nominative (including those with participle constructions) and infinitive constructions.

References

Zannettou S., Chatzis S., Papadamou K., Sirivianos M., The good, the bad and the bait: detecting and characterizing clickbait on youtube. 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), IEEE. 2018. Р. 63–69.

Biyani P., Tsioutsiouliklis K., Blackmer J., “8 Amazing secrets for getting more clicks”: detecting clickbaits in news streams using article informality. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2016. № 30(1).

Bell A. The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell. 1991. 277 p.

Mormol P. «I Urge you to see this...». Clickbait as one of the dominant features of contemporary online headlines. Social communication. 2019. № 2. Р. 1–10.

Pujahari A., Sisodia D.S. Clickbait detection using multiple categorisation techniques. Journal of information science. 2021. № 47(1). Р. 118–128.

Pengnate S.F., Chen J., Young A. Effects of clickbait headlines on user responses: an empirical investigation. Journal of international technology and information management. 2021. № 30(3.). Р. 1–18.

Rony M.M.U., Hassan N., Yousuf M. Diving deep into clickbaits: who use them to what extents in which topics with what effects? Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference. 2017. Р. 232–239.

Andrew B. Media-generated shortcuts: do newspaper headlines present another roadblock for low-information rationality? The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2007. № 12(2). Р. 24–43.

Tafesse W. YouTube marketing: how marketers’ video optimisation practices influence video views. Internet Research. 2020. № 30(6). Р. 1689–1707.

Blom J.N., Hansen K.R. Click bait: forward-reference as lure in online news headlines. Journal of pragmatics. 2014. № 76. Р. 87–100.

Orosa B.G., Santorun S.G., García X.L. Use of clickbait in the online news media of the 28 EU member countries. Revista latina de comunicación social. 2017. № 72. Р. 1261–1277.

Scott K. You won’t believe what’s in this paper! Clickbait, relevance and the curiosity gap. Journal of Pragmatics. 2021. № 175. Р. 53–66.

Потятиник Б.В. Інтернет-журналістика : навчальний посібник. Львів : ПАІС, 2010. 244 с.

Published

2024-04-09

Issue

Section

PHILOLOGICAL STUDIES