PHENOMENOLOGY OF INTERDISCIPLINARITY AND ITS APPLICATION CONDITIONS IN TRAINING PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS OF ART AND HUMANITIES

Authors

  • OLENA REBROVA
  • HANNA REBROVA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25128/2415-3605.18.3.6

Keywords:

interdisciplinarity, holistic world view, picture of the world, future teachers of art and humanities

Abstract

The issue of interdisciplinarity in the modern educational space has been viewed as its organizational principle ensuring that the organization of the educational process complies with the requirements for the development of vision of a holistic picture of the world and personal world view. It has been shown that interdisciplinarity has a wider potential for education and science and can be determined as the methodological basis for research conducted in terms of polyparadigmity. The phenomenology of interdisciplinarity characterizing it through the indications of communicativeness, scientific and semantic role, synergy, personal and world view orientation, and research potential has been revealed. The pedagogical conditions guiding an individual to the independent use of interdisciplinarity in the context of phenomenological features related to the formation of a holistic world view have been presented. It has been shown that pedagogical conditions are introduced on the basis of several interdisciplinary content lines that provide a rhizomatic interdisciplinary model of education: artistic content line uniting integrated programs in art, a professional art form, cultural studies, and folk art; humanitarian content line combining aesthetics, ethics, cultural studies, and even economics with artistic culture and a professional art form, based on multiculturalism as well; professional and pedagogical content line combining psychological, pedagogical, and physiological knowledge of art education and humanities with creativity and pedagogical skills of the teacher; personal and acmeological content line uniting the content concept of creative development and self-realization on the basis of interdisciplinary connections that intensify the way of achieving creative success; experimental and methodological content line combining scientific knowledge and research methodology with the study of art itself and the phenomena of art education. The essence of interdisciplinary thinking as a rhizomatic model for exploring polymodal information sources has been clarified. The phenomenology of interdisciplinarity and the ways of its disclosure, such as the activation of research intentions relating to the content lines of the professional field of knowledge, the development of constructive interdisciplinary content and its introduction into the self-study tasks bank, reliance on the experience of students acquired beyond the learning in an informal way have been explored. The effectiveness of the application of the artistic, humanitarian, professional and pedagogical, personal and acmeological, experimental and methodological lines of interdisciplinary synthesis has been confirmed.

References

Arutyunov V. Kh., Mishyn V. M., Svintsitskyy V. M. Metodolohiya sotsialno-ekonomichnoho piznannya: navch. posibnyk. [Methodology of Socio-economic Knowledge] Kyiv, KNEU Publ., 2005. 353 p.

Vasilkova V. V. Mezhdistsiplinarnost kak kognitivnaya praktika (na primere stanovleniya kommunikativnoy teorii) [Interdisciplinarity as a Cognitive Practice (based on the case of communicative theory development)]. Kommunikatsiya i obrazovanie. Sbornik statey, pod red. S. I. Dudnika. [Communication and Education. Collection of Articles, ed. by S. I. Dudnik]. Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg. filosofskoe obshchestvo Publ., 2004. pp. 69−88. Available at: http://anthropology.ru/ru/text/vasilkova-vv/mezhdisciplinarnost-kak-kognitivnaya-praktika-na-primere-stanovleniya.

Kizima V. V. Ot postneklassiki k metafizike totalnosti [From Post-non-classic to Metaphysics of Totality] // TotaUogi-XXI. Postneklasichnі doslіdzhennya [Post-non-classic Research]. 2007, Vol. 17/18, pp. 7−34.

Kyrychenko M.O., Dmytrenko H.A. Stratehichna trayektoriya systemnoyi modernizatsiyi osvity v konteksti pidvyshchennya yiyi yakosti [Strategic Trajectory of System Modernization of Education in the Context of Improving Its Quality]. Science Rise. 2016. Vol. 4/5 (21), pp. 35–43.

Komar O. V. Kholizm i reduktsionizm yak metodolohichni stratehiyi doslidzhennya svidomosti [Holism and Reductionism as Methodological Strategies for the Study of Consciousness]. Materialy Mizhnar. nauk.konf. Lyudyna. Svit. Suspilstvo (do 175-richchya filosof. fak.-tu KNU) , 21-22 kvit. 2009 r. [Proc. Of Int. Conf. Man. World. Society (175th anniversary of KNU Philosophy Faculty)]. Kyiv, Kyyivskyy universytet Publ., 2009. pp.77–79.Lukyanets V. S., Kravchenko O. M., Ozadovska L. V. Suchasnyy naukovyy dyskurs: onovlennya metodolohichnoyi kultury : monohrafiya [Modern Scientific Discourse: Updating Methodological Culture. Monograph]. Kyiv, VIPOL Publ., 2000. 304 p.

Markova L. A. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya v kontekste prostranstvennykh otnosheniy [Interdisciplinary Research in the Context of Spatial Relationships]. Filosofiya nauki [Philosophy of Science]. Vyp. 11: Etos nauki na rubezhe vekov [Ethos of Science at the Turn of the Century]. Moscow, IF RAN, 2005. Available at: https://iphlib.ru/greenstone3/library/collection/articles/document/HASHd8a160ac5013a57fbb04e6

Melnichenko N. Yu. Ot tektologii k sinergetike, ili kratkiy filosofskiy obzor po istorii teoriy sistem [From Tectology to Synergetics, or a Brief Philosophical Overview of the History of Systems Theory]. Available at: www.gramota.net/materials/3/2012/2-2/38.html

Metodolohiya mizhdystsyplinarnykh doslidzhen u sferi osvity: rob. navch. prohrama dlya spetsialnosti 8.1801002 «Upravlinnya navchalnym zakladom» (osvitno-kvalifikatsiynyy riven «mahistr»); rozrobnyk Sysoyeva S. O. [Methodology of interdisciplinary research in the field of education. Syllabus for specialty 8.1801002 "Management of an educational institution" (educational qualification level "Master") by Sysoyeva S. O.]. Kyyiv. Borys Hrinchenko Kyyiv University, 2014. 56 p.

Myednikova H. S. Transformatsiya metodolohichnykh osnov sotsialno-humanitarnykh nauk [Transformation of the methodological foundations of social and humanitarian sciences] Naukovyy chasopys Nats. ped. un-tu imeni. Seriya : Relihiyeznavstvo. Kulturolohiya. Filosofiya [Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Series: Religious Studies. Culturology. Philosophy]. Kyiv. NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova Publ., 2009. Vol. 21(34). pp. 214−220.

Ohnevyuk V.O., Sysoyeva S. O. Osvitolohiya: khrestomatiya. Navch. Posibnyk [Educational Science. Chrestomathy]. Kyiv, Edelveys Publ., 2013. 742 p.

Filosofiya osvity: navchalnyy posibnyk / Za zah. red. V. Andrushchenka, I. Peredborskoyi [Philosophy of Education: Textbook. Edited by V. Andrushchenko, I. Peredborska]. Kyiv, NPU im. M. P. Drahomanova Publ., 2009. 329 p.

Haken H., Stadler (Eds.) M. Synergetics of Cognition // Proceedings of the International Symposium at SchloB Elmau, Bavaria, June 4−8, 1989. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm%3A978-3-642-48779-8%2F1.pdf.

Selye H. From dream to discovery. On being a scientist. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964. Available at: https://catalog.libfl.ru/Record/BJVVV_208266.

Published

2019-04-09

Issue

Section

ПЕДАГОГІЧНА НАУКА У МІЖДИСЦИПЛІНАРНОМУ ВИМІРІ