DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ECOSYSTEMS IN THE CONTEXT OF AI MODEL SPECIALIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3605.26.1.1Keywords:
artificial intelligence in education, autonomous AI agents, RAG architecture, inquiry-based learning, multimodal environment, DigComp 3.0Abstract
The systemic evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in higher education is currently shifting from general-purpose generative models toward specialized agentic architectures. In the context of modern pedagogical science, this shift is driven by the limitations of mainstream AI solutions, which often lack accuracy in specific scientific domains and exhibit complexity when applied to comprehensive educational scenarios. This necessitates the implementation of specialized environments capable of ensuring high factual reliability while optimizing the cognitive resources of both students and educators. According to the updated European Digital Competence Framework (DigComp 3.0, 2025), developing the capacity for critical algorithm management and the use of verified knowledge bases has become a strategic priority for professional teacher training. The study aims to substantiate a multimodal agentic ecosystem as a methodological framework for inquiry-based learning that enhances academic integrity and professional competence in informatics teacher training. This model defines the AI agent not merely as a chatbot but as a functional instrument for intellectual support, bridging the gap between advanced architectural solutions and practical pedagogical strategies. The methodology combines a systemic approach to AI architecture analysis, a synthesis of cognitive load theory, and empirical verification via a case study involving the NotebookLM platform. This involved an analysis of how agentic workflows facilitate the transition from linear information retrieval to iterative research cycles. Furthermore, a comparative assessment was conducted to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed framework in automating routine data structuring. The results confirm that the proposed model is a valid framework, showing strong alignment with the requirements for multimodal knowledge integration across text, code, and visuals. A central finding is the effectiveness of RAG-architecture in grounding AI responses in verified professional corpora, such as national educational guidelines. Testing within a «Prompt Engineering» course demonstrated that specialized agentic systems significantly minimize factual errors, allowing students to shift their cognitive focus from data verification to high-level synthesis and critical evaluation of educational content. The research concludes that modern informatics teacher training must integrate multimodal agentic systems to prepare specialists capable of managing dynamic knowledge bases. Ultimately, this transforms the teacher’s role from a knowledge transmitter to a designer of the learning environment, coordinating the «teacher – AI-agent – student» interaction within a unified digital ecosystem.
References
Генсерук Г. Р., Громяк М. І. Використання штучного інтелекту в освіті. Підготовка майбутніх учителів фізики, хімії, біології та природничих наук в контексті вимог Нової української школи : матеріали VI Міжнар. наук.-практ. конф. (Тернопіль, 23–24 травня 2024 р.). Тернопіль: ТНПУ ім. В. Гнатюка, 2024. С. 256–258.
Каліндруз Б. М., Кібаленко В. В. Цифрова компетентність викладача в епоху генеративного штучного інтелекту. Цифрова трансформація в освіті: виклики та перспективи : матеріали міжнар. наук.-практ. конф. (Київ, 15–16 квітня 2025 р.) / уклад. І. А. Твердохліб, Є. В. Малюх. Київ: Вид-во УДУ імені Михайла Драгоманова, 2025. С. 12–15.
Морзе Н. В., Бойко М. А., Струтинська О. В., Смирнова-Трибульська Є. М. Якою має бути цифрова компетентність вчителів у галузі використання штучного інтелекту? Відкрите освітнє е-середовище сучасного університету. 2024. Вип. 16. С. 76–91. https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2024.166.
Олексюк В. П., Спірін О. М., Іванова С. М., Мінтій І. С., Вакалюк Т. А., Кільченко А. В. Огляд досвіду використання штучного інтелекту для розвитку цифрової компетентності науково-педагогічних працівників. Journal of Information Technologies in Education (ITE). 2025. Вип. 2(58). 146–158. https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000806.
Помиткіна Л., Помиткін Е., Кокарева А. Взаємодія людини з системами штучного інтелекту під впливом стресу: довіра, помилки та когнітивні механізми рішень. Вісник Національного авіаційного університету. Серія: Педагогіка, Психологія. 2025. 2(27). С. 81–88. https://doi.org/10.18372/2411-264X.27.20726.
Binns R. Binns R. On the apparent conflict between individual and group fairness. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2020. P. 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372864
Cosgrove, J., & Cachia, R. DigComp 3.0: European Digital Competence Framework / European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2025. ISBN 978-92-68-32677-0. DOI: 10.2760/0001149.
Floridi L., Cowls J. A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society. Machine Learning and the City: Applications in Architecture and Urban Design / ed. by S. Carta. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2022. P. 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.ch45.
Gemini Team, Google. Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805. 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11805
Google Cloud. Grounding with Google Search and enterprise data. Google Cloud Documentation. 2024. URL: https://cloud.google.com/ai/generative-ai/docs/grounding.
Hughes S. Hallucination Leaderboard by Vectara. Hugging Face Spaces. 2023. URL: https://huggingface.co/spaces/vectara/leaderboard
Khan Academy. Khanmigo: Transforming the classroom with AI. Annual Report 2023–2024. 2024. URL: https://2023-2024.annualreport.khanacademy.org/khanmigo.
Microsoft Research. The New Future of Work Report 2023. 2023. URL: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/NFWReport2023.pdf
Mollick E. Co-Intelligence: Living and working with AI. New York: Portfolio/Penguin, 2024. 256 p.
Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2020. Vol. 68 (1). P. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3.






