MODERN TRENDS IN THE METHODOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN THE GLOBAL SCIENTIFIC SPACE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3605.26.1.19Keywords:
research methodology, open science, interdisciplinarity, reproducibility, digitalization, research ethicsAbstract
The article analyzes contemporary trends in the development of research methodology in the context of globalization, digital transformation, and the growing complexity of scientific knowledge. The relevance of the study is determined by the limitations of traditional methodological approaches in addressing complex and dynamic phenomena, as well as by the “reproducibility crisis,” which raises concerns about the reliability of scientific results. This necessitates the revision of methodological frameworks and the implementation of standards focused on transparency, openness, and reproducibility.
The aim of the article is to identify and systematize key global trends in research methodology and to substantiate their role in improving the quality of scientific knowledge. The study is based on general scientific methods, including analysis, synthesis, comparison, and generalization of recent international and national scholarly publications.
The paper highlights major methodological shifts, such as the development of open science practices that ensure accessibility of data and transparency of research processes; the growing role of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches in solving complex problems; and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Special attention is given to the impact of digital technologies and artificial intelligence, which significantly transform research processes. Their dual nature is emphasized: they enhance research efficiency while also posing challenges related to academic integrity, ethical responsibility, and algorithmic transparency.
The results indicate that modern research methodology is becoming more flexible, adaptive, and context-sensitive, reflecting a shift toward post-nonclassical scientific rationality. Ethical issues, particularly those related to data sharing and reuse, are identified as a key component of contemporary research practices. The study concludes that current methodological development is oriented toward openness, interdisciplinarity, and technological advancement, which together contribute to the quality and global integration of scientific knowledge.
References
Бабух І. Актуальність та специфіка сучасної методології наукових досліджень. Вісник Хмельницького національного університету. Економічні науки. 2023. № 3 (318). C. 291–294. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2023-318-3-45
Буняк В. Науковий український журнал оприлюднив статтю про вигадану країну. Текст був згенерований ШІ, – «Бабель». Детектор медіа. 06.03.2026. ULR: https://detector.media/infospace/article/248142/2026-03-06-naukovyy-ukrainskyy-zhurnal-oprylyudnyv-stattyu-pro-vygadanu-krainu-tekst-buv-zghenerovanyy-shi-babel/
Візнюк І., Долинний С., Долинна А. Сучасні тенденції методології наукових психолого-педагогічних досліджень. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training Methodology Theory Experience Problems, 2025. 75. 115–126. https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2025-75-115-126
Калюжна Н. Упровадження принципів відкритого доступу в Україні: сучасний стан і перспективи розвитку. Цифрова платформа: інформаційні технології в соціокультурній сфері, 2023. Вип. 6(1). С. 149–159. https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-796X.6.1.2023.283984
Про затвердження Ліцензійних умов провадження освітньої діяльності : постанова Кабінету Міністрів України від 30 грудня 2015 р. № 1187. Київ. ULR: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1187-2015-%D0%BF/ ed20210620#Text
Семикіна М. В., Дмитришин Б. В. Методологічні аспекти наукового дослідження розвитку соціально-економічних систем в умовах глобалізації. Центральноукраїнський науковий вісник. Економічні науки : [наук. зб.]. Кропивницький : ЦНТУ, 2024. Вип. 12(45). С. 68–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32515/2663-1636.2024.12(45).68-80
Сич Т. В. Виклики та переваги використання штучного інтелекту при формуванні дослідницькой компетентності у майбутніх публічних службовців. Публічне адміністрування та національна безпека. 2025. № 8. https://doi.org/10.25313/2617-572X-2025-8-11398
Alexander S. M., Jones K., Bennett N. J. et al. Qualitative data sharing and synthesis for sustainability science. Nature Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 81–88. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0434-8.
Bonaventura M., Latora V., Nicosia V., Panzarasa P. The advantages of interdisciplinarity in modern science. arXiv: Physics and Society. 2017. 12. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.07910
Branney P., Reid K., Frost N., Coan S., Mathieson A., Woolhouse, M. A contextconsent meta-framework for designing open (qualitative) data studies. Qualitative research in psychology. 2019. Vol. 16, Issues 3, SI, pp. 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1605477
Carusi A., Jirotka M. From data archive to ethical labyrinth. Qualitative Research, 2009. 9(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109105032
Cole N. L., Ulpts S., Bochynska A., Kormann E., Good M., Leitner B., Ross-Hellauer T. Reproducibility and replicability of qualitative research: an integrative review of concepts, barriers and enablers. 2024. Retrieved from osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/n5zkw https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/n5zkw
Crompton H., Burke D. Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2023. 20, 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dudda L., Kormann E., Kozula M. et al. Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science. 2025. Vol. 12, No. 4. Article 242057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.242057
Dudda L., Kozula M., Ross-Hellauer T. et al. Scoping review and evidence mapping of interventions aimed at improving reproducible and replicable science: protocol. Open Research Europe. 2024. Vol. 3. Article 179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16567.2
Hopf D., Dellmann S., Hauschke C., Tullney M. Wirkungen von Open Access. Literaturstudie über empirische Arbeiten 2010-2021. 2022. Hannover: Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB). https://doi.org/10.34657/7666
Kohrs F.E., Auer S., Bannach-Brown A., Fiedler S. et al. Eleven strategies for making reproducible research and open science training the norm at research institutions. Elife. 2023 Nov 23;12:e89736. doi: 10.7554/eLife.89736.
Lammer L. Why we should all be reflexive: The case for reflexivity in quantitative science. OSF. 2023. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/re6zq
Leonelli S. Rethinking Reproducibility as a Criterion for Research Quality. In L. Fiorito, S. Scheall, & C. E. Suprinyak (Eds.), Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology. 2018. Vol. 36, pp. 129–146). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0743-41542018000036B009
McLeod J., O’Connor K. Ethics, archives and data sharing in qualitative research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2021. 53(5), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1805310
Morais R., Saenen B., Garbuglia F., Berghmans S., Gaillard V. From principles to practices: open science at Europe’s universities. 2020-2021 EUA open science survey results, 2021. version v1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4966025
Munafò M. R. Open science and research reproducibility. ecancermedicalscience. 2016. Vol. 10. P. ed56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56
Penders B., Holbrook J. B., de Rijcke S. Rinse and Repeat: Understanding the Value of Replication across Different Ways of Knowing. Publications, 2019, 7(3), https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030052
Reeves J., Treharne G. J., Ratima M., Theodore R. et al. A onesize-fits-all approach to data-sharing will not suffice in lifecourse research: A grounded theory study of data-sharing from the perspective of participants in a 50-year-old lifecourse study about health and development. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2023. 23(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01940-6
Singh R.K., Nagpal A., Jadhav A., & Madalli D.P. Assessment of FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) data implementation frameworks: a parametric approach. ArXiv, 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.06268
UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. UNESCO. 2021. 34 p. https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546






