COGNITIVE MECHANISMS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL AUTONOMY AMONG STUDENTS IN THE PROCESS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING: A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3605.26.1.22

Keywords:

learning autonomy, cognitive mechanisms, metacognition, self-regulation, learning strategies, foreign language learning, self-directed learning

Abstract

The relevance of this study is determined by the growing role of student learning autonomy as a key prerequisite for effective foreign language acquisition in contemporary Ukrainian higher education, particularly under wartime challenges and during the ongoing reconstruction of the educational system. The aim of this article is to identify, theoretically substantiate, and systematize the cognitive mechanisms underlying the development of learners’ academic autonomy in the process of foreign language learning. The present study is of a theoretical and analytical nature, and it was conducted as a systematized review of the scientific literature. The methodological foundation of this study is predicated on analytical-thematic processing of recent publications, followed by comparative analysis and conceptual synthesis of the results. The findings indicate that student learning autonomy is a multidimensional construct, with its core represented by the coordinated interaction of cognitive and metacognitive mechanisms. These mechanisms support information processing, selection and application of learning strategies, as well as planning, monitoring, and adjustment of learning activities. Self-regulation functions as the operational form through which these mechanisms are implemented, while metacognition ensures their coordination at the level of awareness, reflection, and adaptation to learning conditions. Furthermore, the role of motivation and self-efficacy in supporting and activating cognitive processes is demonstrated, thereby enhancing students’ readiness for autonomous foreign language learning. The review of research approaches underscores the pivotal function of an educational milieu that integrates cognitively oriented learning strategies, metacognitive guidance, and opportunities afforded by digital technologies. In light of the aforementioned insights, a series of recommendations are proposed for the systematic integration of cognitive and metacognitive practices into the educational process. These recommendations are designed to promote the progressive development of students’ self-regulatory skills and the transformation of the teacher’s role to facilitate learners’ cognitive activity. The findings indicate the efficacy of a cognitively oriented approach to cultivating learning autonomy as a catalyst for enhancing the effectiveness, adaptability, and resilience of foreign language education in higher education.

References

Храбан Т. Є. Розвиток метакогнітивних стратегій у системі неперервного навчання студентів англійської мови: досвід і перспективи. Неперервна професійна освіта: теорія і практика. 2025. № 4. Вип. 85. С. 82–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-0774.2025.4.6.

Храбан Т. Є. Рекомендації щодо якісного висвітлення проблем неперервної освіти. Неперервна професійна освіта: теорія і практика. 2024. № 3. Вип. 80. С. 57–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-0774.2024.3.5.

Albalawi A. The Role of Individual Differences in L2 Vocabulary Learning: A Review of Out-of-Class Exposure, Strategic Learning and Motivation. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2024. № 7. Iss. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v7n3.1641.

Cai Y. Metacognitive strategy use in foreign language learning fluctuates from both ends towards the middle: Longitudinal evidence for the Island Ridge Curve. System. 2024. № 123. Article 103324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103324.

Chong S. W., Reinders H. Autonomy of English language learners: A scoping review of research and practice. Language Teaching Research. 2022. № 29. Iss. 2. P. 607–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221075812.

Holec H. Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon, 1981. 53 p.

Jiao R. Autonomy in Learning English as a Foreign Language: A Case Study of Chinese College Students. International Journal of Practical and Pedagogical Issues in English Education. 2025. № 3. Iss. 1. P. 56–74. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJPIE.2025.484979.1058.

Li X. Developing EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Relation to Learner Autonomy through Online Teacher Development Workshops. SAGE Open. 2023. № 13. Iss. 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231202883.

Little D. Language Learner Autonomy: Some Fundamental Considerations Revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 2007. № 1. Iss. 1. P. 14–29. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0.

Little D., Dam, L., Legenhausen, L. Language Learner Autonomy: Theory, Practice and Research. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters, 2017. 280 p. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098606.

Nejati R., Ilchi H. Investigating the Role of Self-directed Learning and Personal Self-concept in Reading Comprehension of EFL Intermediate Students. Iranian Journal of Research in English Education. 2023. № 8. Iss. 1. URL: http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-750-en.html.

Richardson D., Matthews B. Location-Based Games for Language Learning: A Scoping Review. Research Synthesis in Applied Linguistics. 2025. № 1. Iss. 2. P. 270–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/29984475.2025.2527650.

Roseni E., Muho A. Impact of Gamification and Interactive Language Learning Platforms on Engagement and Proficiency in English Language Education. Journal of Education Culture and Society. 2024. № 15. Iss. 2. P. 205–222. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.2.205.222.

Sadigzade Z. Language Learning Through Games: A Computational Linguistics Perspective. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education. 2025. № 2. Iss. 3. P. 163–188. https://doi.org/10.69760/egjlle.2500206.

Tareen H. Afghan EFL lecturers’ beliefs about autonomous language learning. Cogent Social Sciences. 2025. № 11. Iss. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2445793.

Teng L. S., Zhang L. J. Effects of motivational regulation strategies on writing performance: A mediation model of self-regulated learning of writing in English as a second/foreign language. Metacognition and Learning. 2018. № 13. Iss. 2. P. 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9171-4.

Teng M. F., Wang C., & Wu J. G. Metacognitive Strategies, Language Learning Motivation, Self-Efficacy Belief, and English Achievement During Remote Learning: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. RELC Journal. 2021. № 54. Iss. 3. P. 648–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211040268.

Yang F. Y. Flexibility as a Double-Edged Sword? Language Learner Autonomy in a Blended Self-Directed Learning Program beyond the Classroom. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2023. № 6. Iss. 3. P. 188–204. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v6n3.1194.

Yesi Y., Mardiah M. From Metacognitive Awareness to Self-Directed Learning: Insights from Non-English Majors. Journal of Education Research. 2025. № 6. Iss. 4. P. 1108–1116. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v6i4.2927.

Zhang W., Zhang D., & Zhang L. J. Metacognitive Instruction for Sustainable Learning: Learners’ Perceptions of Task Difficulty and Use of Metacognitive Strategies in Completing Integrated Speaking Tasks. Sustainability. 2021. № 13. Iss. 11. Article 6275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116275.

Published

2026-05-29